The answer depends on the papers you read. A 2011 paper [Acad Med.
2011;86:359–364.] found that higher empathy
was related to better clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Good news, yes?
Well, it seems so until you read the paper and discover that the research was
based in a sample of 29 family physicians (but 891 patients). The paper had
good methodology but how far can we get with 29 people? In contrast to this, a
2012 paper [Medical Teacher- 2012; 34: e116–e122] looking at the importance of empathy on changing specialty among medical
students (858/1321 students from 5 medical schools) found that is wasn't important
and changed little over the course of one year. Finally, a 2013 paper [Medical Teacher-2013; 35:
e946–e951] examined empathy among 72 medical
students longitudinally (during 5th and 6th year). The
study threw two interesting findings; (1) students were reported less empathy
over time, which the authors report as being due to additional clinical
responsibility, more patient contact and more management decisions, and (2) students who self-rated as having more
empathy received lower competence evaluations from their peers. In my opinion (not the
authors), it sounds like the organisation is very effectively teaching them
that empathy is not so important.
Three very
different studies, with the first one relating to family physicians and the
second two concerning medical students. Difficult to know what to conclude, but
food for thought none the less. If we actually reinforce medical students not
to be have empathy, maybe we should ask why?