There is an engaging article in the recent issue of medical education [MEDICAL
EDUCATION 2013; 47: 942–949]. It’s actually an email dialogue
between Dr David Hirsh and Professor Paul
Worley. They attempt to address three important questions; Who are medical
schools for? What is medical education for? What is the telos (the ultimate
aim) of medical education? There is a lot of rich material in the exchange and
I can’t do it proper justice here, but I will select out the elements that I
liked best:
1. The goals and
purpose of medical education should be community engaged. Thus, communities
should be co-creators of the curriculum and its delivery.
2. There is a
need to move beyond student-centeredness in medical education.
3. The article highlights
Cuba and the Barrio Adentro programme in Venezuela as exemplars of community
engagement, and suggests that such models could fuel discovery and innovation.
4. The final line
of the paper is quotable; “The systemic result is that the goal of transforming
medical education to repair society may actually transform us!”
These are just four parts that I liked; the
paper is definitely worth a read. It’s rare that we see a paper exploring the
values needed in medical education
No comments:
Post a Comment